Starburst

PRESENTATION OF ART- ANALYSIS WORKSHEET

1. General Description of the Show

Starburst: Color Photography in America 1970-1980


A. The artists' name(s): This show was a compilation of multiple artists including Nan Goldin, Stephan Shore, Gary Winogrand, Cindy Sherman, Joel Meyerowitz, William Eggleston, Mitch Epstein, and Helen Levitt.

B. How many pieces are in the show: Each artists series of images ranged in size. Some artists such as Cindy Sherman only had one piece in the exhibit. Other artists had numerous images in the show.

C. Describe the location/context of the exhibition space: The show was set up in the Special Exhibition section on the 2nd floor of the Cincinnati Art Museum. Images were displayed on the walls and dividers throughout the space. You can see in the below image that the special exhibit section in at the very top:



D. Describe your perceptions on the content or idea behind the work:
After spending some time examining all the images that this show encompasses my perception of the idea behind the show is that is seems to be a pictorial journey though a period of time as well as through the development of color photography during the 70s and 80s.

2. Give Detailed Descriptions of the Following:

A. The method of presentation of artwork (media of artwork, size of artwork, and how it is presented- frames, mats, pushpins, pedestals, etc). The images shown are a very wide variety of sizes ranging from two inches by two inches all the way up to 3feet by 4 feet. The majority of the images are matted with white mats and framed in very simple off white or black frames. Some are hung directly on the walls while other are placed on shelf’s that line the walls. Types of prints include: Chomogenic prints, dye transfer prints, offset lithography on a magazine page Cibachrome prints, polaroids, inkjet prints, pigment print and ektacolor print. There is also one set of images that is shown on a looping projector that is projected onto the wall, as well as one instillation video pieces shown on a TV.

B. The nature of the exhibition space (size, shape, ceiling height, formal, informal, etc.) The exhibit is set up in an almost maze like format with dividers causing you to wind through the show in a very pre determined way. The ceilings are a slightly higher then normal height, the walls are white, and the floors are wood.


C. The type and nature of the lighting in the exhibition space. The room is very brightly lit with warm overhead lighting. There are rows of track lights that line the walls where work in hung but not individual spotlights for each piece.

D. The relationship of the art pieces to each other (physical and thematic). The works in this show are very much thematically related. While is possesses its own unique subject matter that may physically related to the others in its series each work as a whole carries the same theme as the others in the exhibit.

E. Other external factors (noise level, air currents, number of people in the space, etc.) The area is slightly crowded and warm with a good amount of foot traffic and ambient noise. Other than a small amount of chatter and the scuffle of feet on the floor you can also hear the instillation piece as well as the clicking of the projected piece as it moves from one image to the next.

3. How the Presentation Method Affects the Art (use the back, if necessary)
If you feel that the method used to present the work supports and enhances its meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.If you feel that the method used to present the work detracts from and weakens its meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion. I believe the method used to present the work was very effective in supporting and enhancing the concept to the viewer. The way you had to go on a journey through the maze of images only helped to further push the concept of the images because a specific period of time. The way the images were framed helped to further show the images as a cohesive pieces and I enjoyed taking my time looking at each individually and then thinking about them as a whole later on.

Chewing Color

General Description of the Show

"Chewing Color"

A. The artists' name(s): Marilyn Minter

B. How many pieces are in the show: Ten pieces, altogether.

C. Describe the location/context of the exhibition space: Minter’s show was displayed on the 4th floor of Contemporary Art Center in Downtown Cincinnati. The video project, paintings, and one photograph were displayed in one large room right when you enter the 4th floor gallery. Photographs are then hung down a hallway and also in a smaller room at the end of that hallway.

D. Describe your perceptions on the content or idea behind the work: After taking some time to examine each piece of Minter’s work my perceptions are that her work is a commentary on the ugliness of glamour and beauty in today’s society. All of her images as well as her video piece depict very brightly colored, glittery, shiny, subject matter juxtaposed with very gritty, raw, almost grotesque aspects.


2. Give Detailed Descriptions of the Following:

A. The method of presentation of artwork (media of artwork, size of artwork, and how it is presented- frames, mats, pushpins, pedestals, etc.) This exhibit includes one very large projected video that almost completely encompasses a 60ft wide white wall. Two large (one 76 x 114 and the other 96 x 60), and one smaller painting (24 x 24) all three enamel on mental mounted on the wall with no framing. And lastly 6 photographs (four 40 x 30, one 30 x 40, and one 86 x 60) all simply printed on photographic paper, allowing the viewer to see the rough edge of the negative and hung loosely on the wall with a large black paper clip at each corner.

B. The nature of the exhibition space (size, shape, ceiling height, formal, informal, etc.) The show is set up in a large room with high ceilings, which allows for the pieces to be spread out throughout the area with lots of white space in between each one. In the diagram below the lighter gray area is the space in which Minter’s show was set up:




C. The type and nature of the lighting in the exhibition space: Very low lighting. Spotlights were used to highlight each piece with a few overhead lights here and there. A small amount of natural light was also coming through the door that leads to the staircase.

D. The relationship of the art pieces to each other (physical and thematic). All of the pieces in Minter’s show are connected by their theme of the beautiful vs. the grotesque.

E. Other external factors (noise level, air currents, number of people in the space, etc.) The video has a looping soundtrack that can be heard throughout exhibit, other then this there is very little ambient sound. One noise I did notice to be very prevalent was footsteps. The air was very calm and cool and there were only a handful of people there at any given point in time.

3. How the Presentation Method Affects the Art (use the back, if necessary)
If you feel that the method used to present the work supports and enhances its meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion. If you feel that the method used to present the work detracts from and weakens its meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

I believe the method used to present the work was very effective in supporting and enhancing Minter’s concept to the viewer. The bare raw nature of the space the show was exhibited in only helps to focus the viewers attention. There are no lights, sounds, or images to distract the viewer from what they are supposed to be looking at and interpreting and because of this I think it makes Minter’s message much easier to interpret.

Continued Daily Shooting

Today i went out shooting and it went ok. I think with each experience i am getting a little closer to where i want to be. Here are some examples of what i came back with this time:




I think my next step is going to be to do some work in photoshop to see if i can push my idea a little further that way.

Robert Bengston

While looking into artist who used the art of depth of field i came across the work of Robert Bengston. Although his work may be a bit more commercial then what i intend to do i can still appreciate what he chooses in include and not include in his images. I really enjoy his shooting style and it is definitely something i will keep in mind while shooting. I cannot get the images off of his webpage to show as examples but his site is:

http://www.theartofdetail.com/gallery_dwellings.php?id=Ross

02/23/10 Shooting

Today i went out shooting again. I didn't come back with very much but i have realized that i really think the key to my success is going to be the amount i shoot. I am going to try to shoot at least a little bit everyday from now on. Even if it is only just 10 - 15 minutes a day i think a drastic increase is going to help achieve the results i am looking for.

Here is an one of the images i took today:



I don't think the subject matter in the images i have shot the last two times is exactly what i am going for, but i think shooting the way i am is a really good exercise to get me out of the funk i have been in so far. I plan to do a lot of shooting this weekend so i am hoping to be a little further on track after that.

02/19/10 Shooting

While i still didn't shoot anything i am happy with i could definitely tell i was shooting with a new attitude and i am somewhat optimistic it is going to take me in the right direction. Instead of just looking for details that i thought were "pretty" i would trying very hard to look for details that were not only interestingly beautiful but also stuck out amongst their surroundings. I wanted to pick things that i needed to use my camera functions correctly in order to highlight for the viewer and i although i still haven't quite gotten it i do think i am at least in the right mindset now. I think i just really need to increase the amount i am shooting and hopefully my success will increase as well.

Here is an example of what i shot:

Focusing

Once again i hit a wall. I am tired of feeling like i am taking the images i am because of what others are telling me in my critiques as opposed to what i am actually looking for. Every time i do this i go shot and come back with a bunch of images that i hate and feel no connection to because i am not doing them for me. I think i have finally come to the realization that just because i haven't quite gotten what i want to out of the images i am producing it doesn't mean i need to completely revamp my concept. I like my concept, i want to sick with my concept. I am curious about the details in the objects that surround me on a day to day basis. I want to explore them and look at them in new ways. I enjoy pointing out the beautiful details on objects that people might consider "ugly" or "boring" and using my camera to show them in a new and interesting and beautiful way. Thanks to both David and Janie i can now see that i am simply not accurately showing the viewer this. My passion for this ideas needs to come across to the viewer and at this point i'm not quite pushing it far enough to do so. Because i am using very short depth of field i have now come to realize that what is in focus need to be the most important thing and the images, shapes, forms etc that surround that tiny bit of clear information all needs to work to support it. I need to start being more aware on my picture frame and examine every aspect of what i am capturing and how i am doing so.

Today i spent some time looking at the images of both Keith Carter and Terri Weifenbach and i think it helped me a lot to see that my concept can be solid, i just need to get it to that point by pushing it a little further, being keenly aware or my surroundings to find these simply subtle beautiful details and being a little more aware of exactly what i am and am not including in my images.

Here are some of the images from Carter that i found most intriguing:


"Nine Moons"


"Lemon Moon"


"Black Eye and Moon"

I think is imagery is stunning and i can really see from these images the amount of decision making that went into deciding what would be included, what would not, what would be in focus, what would be blurred, and where things fell in the images space. The only thing that was hard for me to relate to was the fact that they were shot in black and white. In this regard Weifenbach's images really helped me to get a good grasp on how to effectively use all the above mentioned techniques while ALSO being aware of the color.

Here are some of Weifenbach's images that i founds most intriguing:


"XIII"


"Secret 2"


"Secret 26"

The vivid colors that she uses in her images only helps to further focus the viewers attention on exactly what she wants them to see. I think these to artists are the most helpful when it comes to having something to strive for and i know if i just keep trying i will arrive at the standard i have set for myself. I am going to shoot more and while it is hard for me to say that i am excited due to the way things have been going thus far and can say that i am really trying my hardest to be optimistic about it.